Explicit 0.01 mm RangeOkamoto 0.01
- Thickness: 0.01–0.019 mm range
- Material: Hydro polyurethane
- Width: 52 ± 2 mm
- Length: 175 ± 10 mm
- Best for: People prioritising an explicit ultra-thin PU specification
0.01 mm Range • Microns • Latex / PU / Polyisoprene / Nitrile
The thinnest condoms with an explicit manufacturer thickness claim are currently in the 0.01 mm range. Okamoto 0.01 is listed at 0.01–0.019 mm, while Sagami Original 0.01 lists an average film thickness of 0.018 ± 0.008 mm. Mainstream ultra-thin condoms often publish relative claims instead of exact micrometres.
Convert microns, filter current ultra-thin options, compare two products or check a product width against your girth.
Convert a condom film thickness between microns and millimetres.
Filter current manufacturer-stated options by material, width and whether you want an explicit thickness number.
Compare material, width and the type of thinness claim side by side.
Thinness does not fix a width mismatch. Check one ultra-thin product against your erect girth.
The most precise answer depends on what you mean by “thinnest”. Some manufacturers publish an actual film thickness in millimetres or microns. Others only say that a product is a percentage thinner than another condom in their own range.
Among current products with explicit manufacturer numbers, Okamoto 0.01 and Sagami Original 0.01 occupy the thinnest published class found in this review. Okamoto's official 0.01 Hydro Polyurethane product lists a 0.01–0.019 mm film range. Sagami Original 0.01 lists an average of 0.018 ± 0.008 mm, or about 18 microns average.
Those numbers should not be interpreted as proof that every point on one brand is thinner than every point on the other. Manufacturing tolerances overlap, and the brands use different reporting methods.
| Product | Published Thinness | Material | Width | Claim Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Okamoto 0.01 | 0.01–0.019 mm | Hydro polyurethane | 52 ± 2 mm | Explicit thickness range |
| Sagami Original 0.01 | 0.018 ± 0.008 mm average | Polyurethane | 55 ± 2 mm | Explicit average |
| Durex Intensity | “Thinner than a human hair” | Nitrile / BodyFeel | 56 mm | Relative / descriptive |
| Durex Nude | Over 25% thinner | Latex | 52.5 / 56 / 60 mm | Relative |
| SKYN Elite | 15% thinner than Original | Polyisoprene | 53 mm | Relative |
| Trojan BareSkin | Thinnest Trojan latex condom | Latex | 53 mm | Brand-superlative |
| ONE Vanish | Among thinnest latex condoms available | Latex | 53 mm | Brand claim |
Product names in the 0.01 category can refer to a thickness class or range. Okamoto explicitly describes its 0.01 product as the 0.01–0.019 mm range. Sagami Original 0.01 publishes an average of 0.018 mm with a tolerance around that average.
This distinction matters because a product label is not the same thing as a laboratory measurement at every point on every condom. Film thickness varies within manufacturing tolerances.
This figure separates products with explicit measured film thickness from mainstream products that publish only relative thinness.
Okamoto's current official 0.01 Hydro Polyurethane product lists a thickness of 0.01 mm and clarifies the class as 0.01–0.019 mm. The standard product is listed at 52 ± 2 mm width and 175 ± 10 mm length.
It uses hydro polyurethane rather than natural rubber latex. Okamoto also states that the film is designed to maintain the same thickness at the tip and bottom.
The important practical point is that an exceptionally thin film does not make the width irrelevant. If a 52 mm class product does not match your girth, another ultra-thin product with a different width may be a better choice.
Sagami's current official information gives one of the clearest real-world thickness numbers in the category: 0.018 ± 0.008 mm average, equivalent to about 18 microns average.
Sagami uses polyurethane and highlights heat transfer and the absence of a natural-rubber smell. Its standard 0.01 size is listed at approximately 55 ± 2 mm width and 170 ± 10 mm length.
Sagami also offers larger variants in some markets, which is important for users who like the polyurethane feel but need more width or length.
Both are polyurethane ultra-thin condoms in the 0.01 mm class, but the manufacturers report thickness differently. Okamoto publishes a 0.01–0.019 mm range. Sagami publishes an 18-micron average with a ±8-micron variation.
Their standard widths also differ: Okamoto lists 52 ± 2 mm, while Sagami lists 55 ± 2 mm. For many users, that width difference can matter more to comfort and security than a small difference in film thickness.
Durex currently describes Intensity as its thinnest condom yet and says it is thinner than a human hair. It uses a premium nitrile BodyFeel material rather than natural-rubber latex.
Current Durex UK product information lists regular fit at 56 mm nominal width, with a straight shape and reservoir tip. Unlike Okamoto or Sagami, Durex does not publish an exact millimetre film thickness on the current UK page.
Durex Nude is a natural-rubber latex ultra-thin line. Durex currently describes Nude as over 25% thinner in its range comparison and offers close, regular and wide fits.
Current Durex UK information lists 52.5 mm close, 56 mm regular and 60 mm wide. That makes Nude particularly useful for users who want a thin latex condom but do not fit one fixed standard width.
SKYN Elite is a non-latex polyisoprene condom. Current official SKYN product information states that Elite is 15% thinner than SKYN Original and has a 53 mm nominal width.
The material choice is a major part of the product's feel. Someone who dislikes natural-rubber latex or wants a softer synthetic-rubber sensation may prefer SKYN Elite even when a polyurethane condom publishes a lower absolute thickness.
Trojan UK currently calls BareSkin its thinnest latex condom ever. The published size is a straight 53 mm base width with a length around 170–190 mm.
Trojan does not publish a specific film thickness in millimetres on the current UK product page, so it should not be numerically ranked against Okamoto 0.01 or Sagami 0.01 without additional manufacturer data.
ONE currently describes Vanish Hyperthin as among the thinnest latex condoms available. It uses the brand's Sensatex ultra-soft latex, lists a 53 mm nominal width and an average length of approximately 191 mm.
Like Trojan BareSkin, ONE does not publish a precise film thickness on the current product page. The correct way to describe it is therefore “hyperthin” or “among the thinnest latex condoms” rather than assigning an invented micron number.
Material alone does not define thickness. Individual products must be compared by their actual specifications. However, the explicit 0.01 mm-class products in this review use polyurethane because that material can be manufactured into very thin barrier films while retaining the required performance characteristics.
Ultra-thin latex, polyisoprene and nitrile products also exist, but their manufacturers often describe them comparatively rather than publishing an exact micrometre film number.
Polyurethane condoms such as Sagami Original 0.01 and Okamoto 0.01 are very thin, transparent and effective at transmitting heat. Polyisoprene condoms such as SKYN Elite are soft and elastic but use a different synthetic-rubber feel.
Neither material is automatically better for every user. Width, elasticity, lubrication, personal preference and latex sensitivity all affect the choice.
Durex Intensity uses premium nitrile BodyFeel material, while Sagami and Okamoto use polyurethane. Durex emphasizes mouldability and body-heat transfer but does not publish an exact film thickness in millimetres on its current UK page.
If exact numeric thinness is your main criterion, the 0.01 polyurethane products provide more transparent specifications. If a familiar UK fit system and form-fitting synthetic material matter more, Intensity may be easier to compare.
“Ultra-thin” does not automatically mean “unsafe”. Reputable condoms are manufactured and tested as barrier products, and current major brands describe electronic or quality testing as part of their production.
Safety depends heavily on using the condom correctly, choosing a secure fit, avoiding damage, using compatible lubricant and replacing the condom for every act of sex. Do not assume that a thicker condom compensates for incorrect use.
Thickness alone does not determine breakage. Material properties, manufacturing quality, fit, lubrication and correct use all matter.
Sagami, for example, publishes internal burst-pressure comparisons for its polyurethane product, while large mainstream brands emphasize electronic testing. The useful takeaway is not that one thin product is “unbreakable”, but that ultra-thin products are engineered as finished condoms rather than simply shaved-down versions of standard condoms.
Yes. Thinness and width are separate properties. A 0.01 mm condom with a 52 mm nominal width can still be too tight for a person who needs 57 or 60 mm.
Painful constriction, numbness or major difficulty unrolling despite correct orientation are reasons to compare a wider product. Do not choose a narrow condom only because it has the lowest thickness number.
Yes. A very thin condom can still slip if its base is too wide. Repeated slippage or coming off is a reason to compare a narrower width after checking correct application.
| Width | Ultra-Thin Examples In This Guide | Broad Fit Context |
|---|---|---|
| 52 ± 2 mm | Okamoto 0.01 | Close to regular depending on actual unit |
| 52.5 mm | Durex Nude Close | Close fit |
| 53 mm | SKYN Elite, Trojan BareSkin, ONE Vanish | Standard / regular transition |
| 55 ± 2 mm | Sagami Original 0.01 Standard | Regular to wide transition |
| 56 mm | Durex Intensity Regular, Durex Nude Regular | Regular / upper regular |
| 60 mm | Durex Nude Wide | Wide / large |
Current latex-free options in this guide include polyurethane Sagami Original 0.01, polyurethane Okamoto 0.01, polyisoprene SKYN Elite and nitrile Durex Intensity.
“Latex-free” is not one material category; each synthetic material has different stretch and feel. Check the exact product instructions and ingredient/material information if you have known sensitivities.
If your best fit is around 53 mm, SKYN Elite, Trojan BareSkin and ONE Vanish all provide current ultra-thin options in that width class. Their main differences are material and brand-specific feel rather than nominal width.
If you prefer 56 mm, Durex Intensity and Durex Nude Regular are direct current options.
Durex Nude currently offers a 60 mm wide fit in its ultra-thin latex range. Sagami also offers larger polyurethane variants in selected markets.
Wider users should avoid assuming that the absolute thinnest product is automatically the best if the standard width is too narrow. A slightly thicker condom in the correct width is generally a more sensible fit choice than an ultra-thin condom that creates painful pressure.
Manufacturers design ultra-thin condoms to reduce the barrier between partners, and many market them specifically for increased sensitivity or heat transfer. However, perceived sensation is subjective.
Fit, lubrication, material softness and anxiety about the condom can influence sensation as much as film thickness. A well-fitting 53 mm polyisoprene condom may feel more natural to one person than a thinner but tighter polyurethane condom.
A reputable ultra-thin condom is still intended as a barrier product. The correct question is whether the product is approved for its market, within date, undamaged, stored correctly and used properly.
No condom eliminates all risk, and incorrect or inconsistent use can lead to slipping, breaking, pregnancy or STI exposure.
“Thinner than a human hair” is a useful marketing image but not a precise scientific comparison because human-hair diameter varies widely. If you want to compare products technically, a published micron or millimetre film thickness is more useful.
Durex Intensity currently uses the human-hair comparison, while Sagami and Okamoto publish actual 0.01 mm-class measurements.
One millimetre equals 1,000 microns. Therefore 0.01 mm equals 10 microns, 0.018 mm equals 18 microns and 0.02 mm equals 20 microns.
A micron chart is useful for products with real published film measurements. It should not be used to invent numbers for brands that only say “15% thinner”, “over 25% thinner” or “our thinnest ever”.
A 0.01 mm-class condom and a 0.02 mm-class condom sound almost identical on a package, but the numbers represent a substantial film-thickness difference. In simple terms, 0.01 mm equals 10 microns and 0.02 mm equals 20 microns.
Okamoto's current 0.02 Hydro Polyurethane line is described as roughly 0.02–0.029 mm, while its 0.01 line sits in the 0.01–0.019 mm class. Sagami similarly sells 0.01 and 0.02 polyurethane families. These numbers make the Japanese polyurethane category unusually transparent compared with brands that publish only “ultra thin” or percentage-thinner language.
A lower film number does not automatically make the product a better choice. If the 0.02 product fits your width and shape needs better, it can be the more practical option.
Sensation is not determined only by thickness. Polyurethane manufacturers often emphasize heat transfer because the material conducts warmth differently from natural rubber latex.
Sagami specifically promotes the rapid transfer of body heat through its polyurethane film. Durex Intensity likewise markets BodyFeel nitrile around improved body-heat transfer compared with latex. That means two condoms with different thickness claims can still feel surprisingly similar or different depending on thermal conductivity and material softness.
A condom can be extremely thin but feel less natural if its material is comparatively stiff for your preferences. Conversely, a slightly thicker but softer or more elastic condom may move with the body in a way that feels less noticeable.
SKYN Elite is a good example of a product marketed around both thinness and softness. It does not publish a precise micron film number on the current product page, but its polyisoprene construction is a major part of the product experience.
Lubrication can have a major effect on comfort and perceived sensitivity. A well-lubricated condom can reduce friction and make the barrier feel less noticeable, while insufficient lubrication can make even the thinnest condom feel uncomfortable.
Always follow the lubricant instructions for the exact material. Latex condoms should not be used with oil-based lubricants. Synthetic products can have different compatibility rules, so do not transfer lubricant advice from one material to another without checking the package.
Thickness does not change the basic need for careful storage. Condoms should be kept away from excessive heat, friction, sharp objects and damaged packaging.
A very thin product should not be carried carelessly in a wallet for long periods or stored where temperature and abrasion can degrade the package or material. Check the expiry date before use and discard any condom whose wrapper is damaged.
A fair comparison separates three types of claims. The strongest technical evidence is an explicit thickness in millimetres or microns. The second type is a relative statement such as “15% thinner than our Original”. The third is a brand-superlative such as “our thinnest latex condom”.
These categories should not be mixed into one artificial numerical ranking. If one brand publishes 18 microns and another only says “25% thinner”, you cannot calculate which is thinner without knowing the reference product's film thickness and measurement method.
That is why this page calls Okamoto and Sagami the leaders in the explicitly measured thinness category, while Durex, SKYN, Trojan and ONE are presented as strong mainstream ultra-thin options rather than assigned invented micron positions.
Choose fit over a lower thickness number. If an ultra-thin 52 mm condom is painfully tight but a 56 or 60 mm product fits securely, the wider product is the more appropriate starting point even if its manufacturer does not publish a 0.01 mm claim.
A secure, comfortable fit supports correct use. An uncomfortable size can encourage incomplete unrolling, excessive stretching, slippage or avoidance of condoms altogether.
The market becomes narrower when you combine extreme thinness with large nominal width. Durex Nude currently offers a 60 mm wide ultra-thin latex option, while Sagami offers larger polyurethane variants in selected markets.
If your fit needs go beyond those ranges, prioritise a secure width first and then compare the thinnest products available inside that size family. Do not downsize into a narrow 0.01 product simply to obtain a lower film number.
There are several current routes. Okamoto 0.01 and Sagami Original 0.01 use polyurethane. SKYN Elite uses polyisoprene. Durex Intensity uses premium nitrile BodyFeel material.
Their feel, stretch and sizing systems differ. The “best” latex-free ultra-thin condom is therefore the one that combines the material you tolerate with the width and length that fit your body.
Even when two manufacturers publish millimetres, they may measure different parts of the film or use different internal methods and tolerances. A single average, a range and a nominal class are not identical reporting formats.
Treat published thickness as useful technical context rather than laboratory proof of superiority. For a consumer decision, width, material, fit, comfort and correct use remain more important than a difference of only a few microns.
Start with fit, then material, then thinness. If you need around 52 mm and want an explicit 0.01 mm polyurethane option, Okamoto 0.01 is a natural comparison. Around 55 mm, Sagami Original 0.01 becomes highly relevant.
Around 53 mm, SKYN Elite, Trojan BareSkin and ONE Vanish offer different material choices. Around 56 mm, Durex Intensity and Durex Nude Regular are current mainstream options. At 60 mm, Durex Nude Wide provides a current ultra-thin wide-fit route.
Use a new condom for every act of sex, follow the packet instructions, check the expiry date and open the wrapper carefully. Pinch air from the tip, unroll fully and hold the base during withdrawal.
With latex condoms, use water-based or silicone-based lubricant and avoid oil-based products that can weaken latex. Synthetic materials can have different lubricant compatibility, so always follow the exact product instructions.
Common questions about 0.01 mm condoms, microns, polyurethane, latex, SKYN, Durex, Trojan and ultra-thin safety.